Revised Rules For GPF Authorizations

Revised Rules For GPF Authorizations: Reexamined Procedure to be followed for Payment of GPF, Revised Procedure to be followed for installment of GPF Authorizations. Reconsidered Procedure to be embraced in Payment of GPF Authorizations.

Technique to be embraced in installment of GPF approvals. Cir. Update. No.03, Dated: 04-07-2014 Details. All the DDOs ought to follow the reconsidered strategy of getting ready two separate bills.

Revised Rules For GPF Authorizations

Legislature of Andhra Pradesh, Finance Department, Cir. Update No.03/HR.VII/2014, Dated. 04-07-2014-Subject: A.P. State Reorganization Act,2014-Appointment of GPF Liabilities – Procedure to be received in installment of GPF approvals – Revised requests – gave.

Reference: 

1.G.O.Ms.No.137, Finance (Pen.II)Dept, Dt:31.05.2014; 

2. Lr.No.AG (A&E)FM/GL.II/2014-15/606, Dt: 17.06.2014 of DAG(Acs&VLC) O/o AG(A&E) A.P and Telangana;

3. Letter No. M3/(H1)/3806/2014, Dt.25-6-2014 of the DTA, AP,Hyderabad.

The Principal Accountant General (PAG (A&E)) Andhra Pradesh and Telangana at Hyderabad has seen certain insufficiencies on in the Government Order(GO) first refered to and recommended an updated methodology of two separate bills rather than a solitary bill while favoring bill for installment of Final GPF approvals as the exchanges include two unique heads of record.

Government vide G.O. Ms. No.137, Finance (Pen.II) DeptDt: 31.05.2014 has recommended the methodology for installment of cases relating to GPF approvals by the DDOs via single bill appropriately demonstrating the portion of each state in two significant heads of record for example 8009 and 8793-Interstate anticipation.

As per the arrangements of SR 2(e) under TR 16 of APTC "a different bill must be arranged when charge is debitable to more than one significant head of record, however not a solitary bill as on account of pay and recompenses of government worker or a foundation dubitable to at least two significant heads when entire charge isn't drawn from Revenue of the state".

The APTC Form 40, i.e the bill where the drone of GPF last installment must be made can oblige just one charge head i.e 8009. The exchange that covers two heads of record i.e 8009 and 8793 fall under various Sub Accounts. As a particularly single bill can't be liked with the over two heads.

Revised Rules For GPF Authorizations

Along these lines, two separate bills, for example one under MH 8009 and the other bill under 8793, Inter State Suspense should be ready. The Impact programming by and by utilized by DTA doesn't accommodate booking under (02) significant heads with a solitary bill.

Along these lines, all the DDOs are told to follow the amended system of getting ready two separate bills for complete approved sum appropriately taking essential consideration in programming and blank page registers to guarantee that the two bills relating to every approval are introduced at time to stay away from copy installments.

One bill disputable to MH 8009 is to be upheld by bore witness to duplicate of approval and duplicate of the each other bill debitable to MH 8793 ought to be joined with unique approval.

It is additionally educated to the Payment Authorities to

(I) honor both the bills and guarantee that the absolute installment doesn't surpass the complete of that specific approval

(ii) guarantee accuracy of order of the charge for example MH 8009 or MH 8793 by and large and

(iii) communicate charge vouchers to AGs Office alongside the applicable sub-record to empower brief repayment from the other replacement State Government.

The DDOs and the Payment Authorities ought to likewise record the exchange I.D. (token number/voucher number) in both the bills as a cross reference to one another.

Comparable strategy ought to likewise be embraced for all installments made under the Social Security-cum-Provident Fund Scheme (Booster Scheme) under MH 2235

>>>>Download the Revised Rules Memo.3 here<<<<